The unexpected outbreak of the pandemic has had a direct and far-reaching impact on all sectors including Christian churches nationwide. In mid-April, CCD had an online interview with three members of the clergy from different regions to discuss: What impact does the outbreak have on the church?
The vast majority of churches had to suspend their on-site gatherings since the 23rd of January. All three millennial participants observed that while some churches have continued their regular events by live-streaming Sunday sermons on WeChat, many churches composed mainly of middle-aged and older believers are struggling to adopt to this new model of online worship. Even though some churches provide continuous online pastoral care, the quality of it is worrying as believers at home are invisible at the other end of the line.
The three participants who shared their observations and reflections represent different perspectives.
Brother L, a cell group member from eastern China, was born in the 1980s.
Brother X, a youth group cell leader from eastern China, was born in the 1990s.
Brother M, a non-ordained pastor from central China, was born in the 1980s.
Brother L: An emerging phenomenon is this: large urban churches that rent good office space are now under greater financial pressure because of the shrinking financial donations brought by the suspension of on-site gatherings. Such churches usually borrow a lot of money that they need to repay. They do not have much savings. Even one month without income puts them under a lot of pressure to repay their loans. Some churches in Canada are like this too. However, small churches can keep going for a while.
Brother X: Actually, some big churches have their own properties and savings so it isn’t a problem. Other churches can also survive if they pay their rent on an annual basis rather than monthly. For instance, a fellow believer I know told me his church paid rent annually. If there is no need to pay rent for months it will be okay, but if the outbreak doesn’t end, and there are predictions that it might continue into the second half of 2020 or even into 2021, there will be massive problems.
Brother M: My city church is tiny. People here are resuming work and business. Everyone is back to living a normal life. My church is also slowly beginning to resume.
Brother L: Now some small churches are resuming, but these are unknown, palm-sized fellowships with no more than 10 members. Their small size allows them to meet, but if there are more than 10 their neighbours might panic, so it is hard to resume big churches for the time being.
Brother M: The outbreak has had an impact on the Church, but it is important to continue services. Now congregations are also eager for online ministries.
Brother X: Concerning online services, the reactions can be very different. A dedicated believer may participate in nearly 10 services in one day but the lazy none. Although online ministries can be done, the home environment can be very distracting. Children, cooking, housework—all these can break a viewer’s concentration and lead to a loss of sacred space. Plus, you can also change from one church to another very easily because the cost is low, and it can be done with one click on your smartphone.
Many churches find online attendance is only half that of on-site services. This will hit bigger fellowships hard. Now that services are online, individuals will cling to the online services of their own fellowship or home church. Even after the outbreak ends, it would still be difficult for the individual to return to on-site gatherings even though businesses are resumed. Since they are all online, why not continue to participate in the home church? Even if the individual is introduced to a new church by the home church it would not work. After all, everything is online anyway so home churches simply keep their own congregations, especially those that do so well as in Wenzhou and Ningbo. Once the outbreak ends, the on-site gatherings will surely recover slowly but not at once. On-site gatherings cannot be replaced by online service.
Brother L: It is impossible to go back to the state before the outbreak. The survival rate of the remaining small churches is relatively high. The outbreak can also affect their beliefs and many of their views, leading to much reflection.
Brother X: After the outbreak, there could be a major shift as believers abandon their original church to worship and serve in other churches. The cost of changing churches online is low, so many believers may choose a church that suited them better after the outbreak. In the post-pandemic era, the believer base is very likely to be reshuffled. Some churches may decline or even close.
Brother L: It will be the same for some denominations abroad. The outbreak has led to a lot of Christians and churches reflecting on their future. When the outbreak first occurred, it was like Doom’s Day. At the beginning of the outbreak, the Charismatics were active and propagating their views on the coming apocalypse. It turned out that their prophecies were false and groundless. Many people associate the pandemic with the apocalypse and events in the Book of Revelation. However, many fail to see how this outbreak is different from smallpox, the bubonic plague and other pandemics. The difference is that now plagues like this mainly rely on the power of the state and society for prevention and control. When the Black Death struck in the Middle Ages, the power of the state and society was low. At that time Christianity was a state religion, beyond and above the state, so Christian communities responded by doing prevention work. But now the status of religions in society has declined. If the outbreak continues for a year or two, large churches may gradually disappear. The outbreak has made the current system of the Church hard to maintain. Personally, I think the future will emphasize a community of faith rather than a visible church.
Brother M: I have a different opinion and view. Some people have no options because of their environment. They have only one church in their area and can only go to that one church. They do not have other options for a faith community.
Brother L: It is different now from the Cultural Revolution. During the Cultural Revolution, there were no cultural events or entertainment for people to follow. So there will be little change for believers after the outbreak because there are many other cultural events to choose from if no church services are available. For this group of believers, the outbreak will only change churches after the end of it. Of course, the outbreak will make many cold Christians thirstier for faith and pray more. But I think it is hard for new believers to emerge because the Church has reached a bottleneck. Overall Brother X is more optimistic about the outlook. I am more pessimistic and think this time is both an opportunity and a challenge. But one thing brother X is exactly right in saying is that the rise of the ordinary believers after the outbreak is inevitable.
- Translated by Charlie Li
话题:疫情对教会产生了什么样的影响?
突如其来的新冠疫情对各行各业都带来了直接和深远的影响,其中包括各地的基督教会。4月中旬,CCD邀请了三位不同地区80后/90后教牧同工,就“疫情对教会产生什么样的影响?”这一话题在线交流讨论。
三位参加者都观察到,因为疫情,各地绝大部分教会自1月23日开始不得不暂停实地聚会,在暂停实地聚会期间,有一些教会开展网络牧会,利用微信等直播工具进行主日布道等常规活动。但基本上很多中老年信徒为主的教会很难过渡到这一新兴模式上。即使有一些教会坚持网络牧养,信徒们分散在家中参加网络牧养的质量也是堪忧的。
随后,三位参加者从不同的角度谈到自己对此话题的观察和思考。
L弟兄:华东80后二线城市一社区团契成员。X弟兄:华东地区四线城市90后青年团契带领人。M弟兄:中原地区一80后教会讲道人。
L弟兄:现在出现的一个现象是:追求规模的城市教会——比如租很不错的写字楼进行聚会的这些教会——现在不少都面面临的财政压力都比较大,因为疫情暂停实地聚会就很难有信徒奉献,这些追求规模的教会之前借很多钱或者贷很多款,基本之前也没有多少存款,如果一个月没有收入就压力很大、还不上贷款,包括加拿大的教会也有这样的样子。反而小教会还可以撑一撑。
X弟兄:其实,一些大的教堂有自己的房产和存款,问题不大。其他一些教会如果这几个月没有遇到交房租的话,也还可以,因为很多教会的房租是年付。比如我问认识的一个弟兄,他们教会就是年付房租,这几个月不需要交房租,所以就还没事,但是如果疫情一直不结束,有预测说要再到下半年或者跨年的话,就很麻烦了。
M弟兄:我在的城市教会比较小,现在基本都复工复产,大家恢复正常生活了,教会也慢慢开始恢复。
L弟兄:现在一些小教会开始聚会了,但这些是没有名气、规模非常小、不超过十个人的团契就几个人实地见面。超过的话社会邻居都会恐慌。所以大的教会暂时是很难恢复的。
M弟兄:疫情对教会是有冲击的,但是聚会还是要继续的,现在弟兄姊妹对网络也是比较渴慕的。
X弟兄:网络聚会的话,效果可以两极化。追求的人一天可以参加七八场,懒惰的人一天一场也不参加。虽然可以网络聚会,但在家很容易被其它事情打扰,带孩子、做饭、做家务....没有集中力,而且没有神圣感。而且可以串教会,因为从在网上从这个教会跳到那个教会看一看,成本比较低,很方便,点一下手机就行了。
很多教会发现网络聚会的人只有以前实地教会的一半。这个会对大一些的团契打击会很大。以前没有线上聚会,所以只能实地过来参加当地的团契。现在都是线上聚会了,那他会继续选择他家乡那个团契或教会的线上教会。疫情结束后,即使复工复产回来了也是很难实地聚会,既然都是线上,为什么不继续参加老家那个呢?就算是老家的团契介绍过来也是没办法,现在反正都线上,老家教会干脆自己牧养,尤其温州、宁波等这种老家教会做的也很好的地方。如果疫情结束,实地聚会也会慢慢恢复,但也不是一下能恢复的。实地聚会是网络聚会没办法取代的。
L弟兄:回到疫情前不可能了,剩下的小教会存活率比较高,疫情也会影响他们对自己的信仰、很多的观点也有一个反思。
X弟兄:疫情之后会有信徒的洗牌,很多信徒会放弃原来的教会到其它教会委身。网络串教会成本比较低,所以疫情结束后,不少信徒会在很多教会当中来选择一种适合自己的教会。所以信徒会有一个重组。有一些教会会衰落甚至可能会结束。
L弟兄:国外的一些宗派也会是一样的。疫情下来,不少基督徒和教会的反思很大。疫情刚发生时,对他们来说相当于末日一样。疫情刚开始时灵恩派很活跃,发出很多的末世论,后来发现他们的预言都是假的,都是瞎说的。很多人将疫情跟世界末日、启示录结合起来。不过很多人没看到,这次疫情跟以前历史上的天花、黑死病等瘟疫不一样的地方是现在主要靠国家和社会的力量来防治疫情,罗马时代还有黑死病的时候,国家和社会力量不行,当时基督教是国教,它是超越国家的,所以基督教出来提供这些服务。但现在宗教地位下降了,它仅仅只是一个宗教团体。如果疫情持续一年二年,大教会可能逐渐就消失了。疫情让以前的教会建制化的方式很多都变得很难了,我个人认为,以后强调信仰是一个信仰共同体,不是一个可见的教会。
M弟兄:你这个观点我有不同看法。有些人所在的环境是没有选的,他当地可能只有1家教会,他只能去那一家教会,没有信仰共同体的选择性。
L弟兄:现在和文革已经不一样了,文革时期文化娱乐各个方面都很少,现在很多。所以疫情之后信徒没有什么变化,因为不聚会也很多其他的项目。对这部分信徒来说,疫情结束后只是会换教会。当然疫情会让很多冷淡的基督徒更加渴慕信仰、祷告之类的。但我认为,新的信徒很难产生,因为教会已经发展到了一个瓶颈。总体而言X弟兄对前景比较乐观。我比较悲观,认为这次是机遇和挑战并存。但有一点,X弟兄说的很到位,就是疫情之后的平信徒崛起,不可抵挡。
https://www.christiantimes.cn/news/31783
The unexpected outbreak of the pandemic has had a direct and far-reaching impact on all sectors including Christian churches nationwide. In mid-April, CCD had an online interview with three members of the clergy from different regions to discuss: What impact does the outbreak have on the church?
The vast majority of churches had to suspend their on-site gatherings since the 23rd of January. All three millennial participants observed that while some churches have continued their regular events by live-streaming Sunday sermons on WeChat, many churches composed mainly of middle-aged and older believers are struggling to adopt to this new model of online worship. Even though some churches provide continuous online pastoral care, the quality of it is worrying as believers at home are invisible at the other end of the line.
The three participants who shared their observations and reflections represent different perspectives.
Brother L, a cell group member from eastern China, was born in the 1980s.
Brother X, a youth group cell leader from eastern China, was born in the 1990s.
Brother M, a non-ordained pastor from central China, was born in the 1980s.
Brother L: An emerging phenomenon is this: large urban churches that rent good office space are now under greater financial pressure because of the shrinking financial donations brought by the suspension of on-site gatherings. Such churches usually borrow a lot of money that they need to repay. They do not have much savings. Even one month without income puts them under a lot of pressure to repay their loans. Some churches in Canada are like this too. However, small churches can keep going for a while.
Brother X: Actually, some big churches have their own properties and savings so it isn’t a problem. Other churches can also survive if they pay their rent on an annual basis rather than monthly. For instance, a fellow believer I know told me his church paid rent annually. If there is no need to pay rent for months it will be okay, but if the outbreak doesn’t end, and there are predictions that it might continue into the second half of 2020 or even into 2021, there will be massive problems.
Brother M: My city church is tiny. People here are resuming work and business. Everyone is back to living a normal life. My church is also slowly beginning to resume.
Brother L: Now some small churches are resuming, but these are unknown, palm-sized fellowships with no more than 10 members. Their small size allows them to meet, but if there are more than 10 their neighbours might panic, so it is hard to resume big churches for the time being.
Brother M: The outbreak has had an impact on the Church, but it is important to continue services. Now congregations are also eager for online ministries.
Brother X: Concerning online services, the reactions can be very different. A dedicated believer may participate in nearly 10 services in one day but the lazy none. Although online ministries can be done, the home environment can be very distracting. Children, cooking, housework—all these can break a viewer’s concentration and lead to a loss of sacred space. Plus, you can also change from one church to another very easily because the cost is low, and it can be done with one click on your smartphone.
Many churches find online attendance is only half that of on-site services. This will hit bigger fellowships hard. Now that services are online, individuals will cling to the online services of their own fellowship or home church. Even after the outbreak ends, it would still be difficult for the individual to return to on-site gatherings even though businesses are resumed. Since they are all online, why not continue to participate in the home church? Even if the individual is introduced to a new church by the home church it would not work. After all, everything is online anyway so home churches simply keep their own congregations, especially those that do so well as in Wenzhou and Ningbo. Once the outbreak ends, the on-site gatherings will surely recover slowly but not at once. On-site gatherings cannot be replaced by online service.
Brother L: It is impossible to go back to the state before the outbreak. The survival rate of the remaining small churches is relatively high. The outbreak can also affect their beliefs and many of their views, leading to much reflection.
Brother X: After the outbreak, there could be a major shift as believers abandon their original church to worship and serve in other churches. The cost of changing churches online is low, so many believers may choose a church that suited them better after the outbreak. In the post-pandemic era, the believer base is very likely to be reshuffled. Some churches may decline or even close.
Brother L: It will be the same for some denominations abroad. The outbreak has led to a lot of Christians and churches reflecting on their future. When the outbreak first occurred, it was like Doom’s Day. At the beginning of the outbreak, the Charismatics were active and propagating their views on the coming apocalypse. It turned out that their prophecies were false and groundless. Many people associate the pandemic with the apocalypse and events in the Book of Revelation. However, many fail to see how this outbreak is different from smallpox, the bubonic plague and other pandemics. The difference is that now plagues like this mainly rely on the power of the state and society for prevention and control. When the Black Death struck in the Middle Ages, the power of the state and society was low. At that time Christianity was a state religion, beyond and above the state, so Christian communities responded by doing prevention work. But now the status of religions in society has declined. If the outbreak continues for a year or two, large churches may gradually disappear. The outbreak has made the current system of the Church hard to maintain. Personally, I think the future will emphasize a community of faith rather than a visible church.
Brother M: I have a different opinion and view. Some people have no options because of their environment. They have only one church in their area and can only go to that one church. They do not have other options for a faith community.
Brother L: It is different now from the Cultural Revolution. During the Cultural Revolution, there were no cultural events or entertainment for people to follow. So there will be little change for believers after the outbreak because there are many other cultural events to choose from if no church services are available. For this group of believers, the outbreak will only change churches after the end of it. Of course, the outbreak will make many cold Christians thirstier for faith and pray more. But I think it is hard for new believers to emerge because the Church has reached a bottleneck. Overall Brother X is more optimistic about the outlook. I am more pessimistic and think this time is both an opportunity and a challenge. But one thing brother X is exactly right in saying is that the rise of the ordinary believers after the outbreak is inevitable.
- Translated by Charlie Li
Topic: What Impact Does COVID-19 Outbreak Has on Church?