I know a Christian friend who could only return to work from her hometown at the end of March after being trapped at home for two months because of the pandemic. For those two months, she couldn't attend on-site church worship services except log in to live streaming services or refer to official accounts.
Reflecting on the online service she experienced, she told of how it has altered her previous perceptions about on-site services and her identification with her church.
Usually, services are on-site. She would sit somewhere to focus on the pastor who was delivering sermons from the pulpit. At that time she was cut off from all other means of communication. In her words, she was fully engaged in the service at the moment. When it was over, she would do various church things: greet fellow believers and ask about their past week; plan on the following week’s Bible reading or home visiting schedule with her cell team leader or arrange a family dinner with better-connected believers. On-site services could allow her to focus all the attention on her church.
Now, she no longer needs to get up early for the services. Instead, she can sleep as long as she wants. After washing-up and having breakfast, she'd first watch the news about the pandemic if she liked. Then she’d open her church’s WeChat account to attend a service. As all the online service content is uploaded in advance, she doesn't feel pressed for time. Rather, she can click open a sermon to listen to at any time.
Yet, while listening she can do other things such as having breakfast or snacks or talking and having fun with her little niece. In her words, she is not being focused enough on the Sunday sermon, as if she was being disrespectful. Surely, the relaxing home environment prevents her from being fully attentive as she used to be.
In addition to this, the way of communicating with fellow Christians has changed too. There is no interaction with them after the online service. What is left for her are all-similar messages or comments posted on the platform which make her so bored like never before.
However, there is an important discovery. She can now listen to sermons from other churches or pastors plus that of her own church. This was impossible in the past.
In the past, nearly every church was very sensitive to cross-membership, going to or serving at more than one church. This would have been questioned by the pastors as an issue of the loyalty of believers. It was even more of a taboo for churches to pull people away from each other, which is known as “stealing from another’s herd”. Now the situation is completely different as she can even compare the advantages and disadvantages of the various pastors’ sermons.
At the moment, she likes to listen to another pastor's sermon because the teachings appear more down to the earth. Such accessibility was completely impossible in the past.
The pattern of interaction with fellow believers is changing. Now the believers she interacts with are no longer confined to the people of her church. The lack of participation in such public activities as home visits, reading groups, and family dinners has further expanded her interaction with more believers. The shift from activity centeredness to sermons, theology and even social issues has allowed her to reach believers beyond the scope of her church. The groups of believers she knows and interacts frequently with come from several different churches and even from different cities.
This service model, which she calls “skipping school”, shifts her focus for the first time from the traditional concepts like churches, chapels or gathering points to looking at the wider horizon and focusing on more interesting issues. Yet, it brings about another issue--she doesn't want to give her financial offering.
Under the traditional model, she would put her enveloped donation into a donation box. That's because she felt it was a matter of getting saved by donating to her church.
Now online preaching resources and hyper-church interactions have downplayed the idea of specific church involvement and thus affected her identity with the original church. She’s able to make a comparison across various churches through available sermons and communication with other believers.
A recent incident reinforced her opinions about her church.
The recently exposed problems of South Korea's Shincheonji cult reveal its efforts to pull people away from Christian churches in China. According to her fellow believers, it is highly likely that one of the church's recently joined believers is an undercover from Shincheonji. Analyzing and comparing the newbie’s various behaviors against online reports about the cult led her to be convinced that the new believer was a member of Shincheonji! In the interest of the church's safety, she immediately informed the chief pastor of the situation and her speculation.
It was thought that this would attract the attention and acknowledgement from the pastor, but to her disappointment, the pastor insisted this was simply impossible and even thought she was being hypercritical.
In her view, the pastor was disrespectful to her and the stubbornness could even put her whole church under the danger of Shincheonji.
She anticipated that for financial reasons the pastor neglected her report because the newbie took a donating-to-the church approach to winning the acceptance of other believers. In addition to regular donations on Sundays, the member supports many other activities of the church and quickly earned the hearts and minds of others.
On the basis of these factors, she is considering whether to change churches. But in any case, in her words, the church she once served doesn't matter to her anymore.
Her experience may not be an isolated case but be the norm. The online service model will inevitably lead to changes in devotion that shakes the believer's identity with their own churches. So when facing practical problems, believers will no longer hold the previous level of patience with their pastors and even their churches. This wavering of church devotion is ultimately reflected directly in the financial devotion of the believers.
This is the church’s crisis that the pandemic outbreak has brought while changing the church service pattern. The crisis is spreading and becoming the basis for the collapse of the traditional Church model. Traditional churches must be well prepared for the loss of believers and reduced economic devotion.
- Translated by Charlie Li
观察丨网络聚会带来的弊端:信徒流失、奉献降低等现象,已始露苗头……
一位教会的姐妹因疫情被困在家里两个月,直到三月底才从家乡返回工作的城市。两个月来,她不能去教会聚会,只能在线上直播的方式,或者公众号上参加主日聚会。
在这位姐妹看来,这种聚会的模式改变了她以往参加聚会的感觉和对教会的认同。
以往的聚会都是现场聚会,她坐在教堂里,望着讲台上的牧师,听着牧师的讲道,这个时候的她是与一切通讯工具隔绝的,按照她的话讲,这个时候她是全然摆上的。聚会结束之后,她忙于教会的其它活动,与一周不见的教友打招呼,询问一周的变化;与小组长计划下一周的读经或者探访活动;也可能与关系比较好的教友计划一次家庭聚餐。这种现场聚会让她一整天都能将自己的关注焦点聚集在这个教会中。
现在她再也不用为主日聚会早起,而是自然醒,然后洗漱、早餐完毕,可能的话她还会先看看新闻,关心一下疫情状况,然后打开微信教会公众号开始参加主日聚会。因为线上的聚会内容都是提前上传的,因此她不会为了时间觉得紧迫,而是随时可以点开收听牧师的主日讲道。
并且在收听的过程中,她还可以做其他的事情,比如吃早餐,或者吃个苹果,再或者与小侄女对话和打闹,用她的话来说,这种线上聚会她太不虔诚了,完全没有将自己的心思聚焦在主日的讲道上。当然,家庭环境的宽松,让她无法像过去那样全然摆上。
除了这些之外,以往对教会教友的交往方式也变了。在参加完线上聚会之后,与教友的互动就没有了,只能查看千篇一律的留言,这些留言这让她感觉到从没有过的无聊。
更重要的是,她除了收听或者收看本教会的聚会,还可以收听其它教会或者其它牧者的主日讲道。这在过去是不可能的事情。
在过去,教会是最忌讳串教会的,尤其是委身两个教会的问题,这会被本教会牧者怀疑信徒的忠诚度,更加禁止其它教会到本教会拉人的现象,这被看做拉羊。现在情况完全不同,她甚至可以比较各个牧者讲道的优缺点。
现在这位姐妹喜欢听另一个牧师的讲道,因为在她看来更接地气,这在过去是完全不可能的。
而与其它信徒的交往模式也在改变,现在她交往的教友已经不再限于本教会的教友。因为没有探访、读经小组、家庭聚餐等这些公共活动的参与,让她与其它教友的交往范围进一步扩大,由过去的以活动为中心转变为讲道和神学,乃至社会问题为中心,这让她认识的教友超越了本教会的范围。她认识并频繁互动的教友群,来自几个不同教会,甚至不同的城市。
这种被她称为可以开小差的聚会模式,让她的关注点第一次离开教会和教堂或者聚会点这个传统模式,而把眼光可以放眼更大的范围,可以关注更多感兴趣的问题。这带来另一个问题,那就是她不想奉献了。
过去的传统模式之下,她会把奉献款投进奉献箱,那是因为她觉得委身教会是件关乎是否得救的事。现在这种线上多种讲道资源的出现,以及超教会范围的交往,淡化具体教会委身,从而影响她对原教会的认同。在通过讲道以及与其它信徒的交流中,让她产生了比较。
而另一件事,更是加深了她对本教会的成见。
对于最近韩国新天地教的问题,也暴露了该宗教在国内其它教会拉人的现象。据其它信徒的信息,本教会有一位近期加入的教友,极有可能是新天地的卧底。综合其各种行为,对比网上的报道,让她确认这个教友是新天地信徒无疑。本着对本教会的安全考虑,这位姐妹马上将信息和自己的推测,告知了本教会的主任牧师。
本以为这会引起牧者的关注和认同,但是牧者的表现却让她失望。在牧者看来,这完全不可能,甚至是无中生有。
在这位姐妹看来,这是牧师对自己的不尊重,甚至有将教会置身新天地教危险之下的可能。
这位姐妹推测牧者不理睬她举报内容的原因,是出于经济因素。因为这位新加入的教友为了赢得其他教友的认同而采取砸钱的方式,除了主日常规奉献之外,还支持教会许多其它活动,这让他迅速获赢得了人心。
正是基于这些因素的考虑,这位姐妹正在考虑是否更换教会。但不管怎样,用她的话说,现在对曾经委身的教会已经无所谓了。
这位姐妹的经历可能并不是孤例,而是具有一定的代表性。线上聚会的模式,不可避免地会带来委身度的改变,动摇信徒对教会的认同,从而面对实际问题上,就不会持有以往对牧者乃至对教会的忍耐程度。这种教会委身度的动摇,最终直接表现在信徒的经济奉献上。
这是疫情在改变教会聚会模式的同时,所带来的教会危机。这种危机正在扩展,而成为传统教会崩盘的基础。传统教会在信徒流失和经济奉献降低方面,必须要有充分的心理准备。
I know a Christian friend who could only return to work from her hometown at the end of March after being trapped at home for two months because of the pandemic. For those two months, she couldn't attend on-site church worship services except log in to live streaming services or refer to official accounts.
Reflecting on the online service she experienced, she told of how it has altered her previous perceptions about on-site services and her identification with her church.
Usually, services are on-site. She would sit somewhere to focus on the pastor who was delivering sermons from the pulpit. At that time she was cut off from all other means of communication. In her words, she was fully engaged in the service at the moment. When it was over, she would do various church things: greet fellow believers and ask about their past week; plan on the following week’s Bible reading or home visiting schedule with her cell team leader or arrange a family dinner with better-connected believers. On-site services could allow her to focus all the attention on her church.
Now, she no longer needs to get up early for the services. Instead, she can sleep as long as she wants. After washing-up and having breakfast, she'd first watch the news about the pandemic if she liked. Then she’d open her church’s WeChat account to attend a service. As all the online service content is uploaded in advance, she doesn't feel pressed for time. Rather, she can click open a sermon to listen to at any time.
Yet, while listening she can do other things such as having breakfast or snacks or talking and having fun with her little niece. In her words, she is not being focused enough on the Sunday sermon, as if she was being disrespectful. Surely, the relaxing home environment prevents her from being fully attentive as she used to be.
In addition to this, the way of communicating with fellow Christians has changed too. There is no interaction with them after the online service. What is left for her are all-similar messages or comments posted on the platform which make her so bored like never before.
However, there is an important discovery. She can now listen to sermons from other churches or pastors plus that of her own church. This was impossible in the past.
In the past, nearly every church was very sensitive to cross-membership, going to or serving at more than one church. This would have been questioned by the pastors as an issue of the loyalty of believers. It was even more of a taboo for churches to pull people away from each other, which is known as “stealing from another’s herd”. Now the situation is completely different as she can even compare the advantages and disadvantages of the various pastors’ sermons.
At the moment, she likes to listen to another pastor's sermon because the teachings appear more down to the earth. Such accessibility was completely impossible in the past.
The pattern of interaction with fellow believers is changing. Now the believers she interacts with are no longer confined to the people of her church. The lack of participation in such public activities as home visits, reading groups, and family dinners has further expanded her interaction with more believers. The shift from activity centeredness to sermons, theology and even social issues has allowed her to reach believers beyond the scope of her church. The groups of believers she knows and interacts frequently with come from several different churches and even from different cities.
This service model, which she calls “skipping school”, shifts her focus for the first time from the traditional concepts like churches, chapels or gathering points to looking at the wider horizon and focusing on more interesting issues. Yet, it brings about another issue--she doesn't want to give her financial offering.
Under the traditional model, she would put her enveloped donation into a donation box. That's because she felt it was a matter of getting saved by donating to her church.
Now online preaching resources and hyper-church interactions have downplayed the idea of specific church involvement and thus affected her identity with the original church. She’s able to make a comparison across various churches through available sermons and communication with other believers.
A recent incident reinforced her opinions about her church.
The recently exposed problems of South Korea's Shincheonji cult reveal its efforts to pull people away from Christian churches in China. According to her fellow believers, it is highly likely that one of the church's recently joined believers is an undercover from Shincheonji. Analyzing and comparing the newbie’s various behaviors against online reports about the cult led her to be convinced that the new believer was a member of Shincheonji! In the interest of the church's safety, she immediately informed the chief pastor of the situation and her speculation.
It was thought that this would attract the attention and acknowledgement from the pastor, but to her disappointment, the pastor insisted this was simply impossible and even thought she was being hypercritical.
In her view, the pastor was disrespectful to her and the stubbornness could even put her whole church under the danger of Shincheonji.
She anticipated that for financial reasons the pastor neglected her report because the newbie took a donating-to-the church approach to winning the acceptance of other believers. In addition to regular donations on Sundays, the member supports many other activities of the church and quickly earned the hearts and minds of others.
On the basis of these factors, she is considering whether to change churches. But in any case, in her words, the church she once served doesn't matter to her anymore.
Her experience may not be an isolated case but be the norm. The online service model will inevitably lead to changes in devotion that shakes the believer's identity with their own churches. So when facing practical problems, believers will no longer hold the previous level of patience with their pastors and even their churches. This wavering of church devotion is ultimately reflected directly in the financial devotion of the believers.
This is the church’s crisis that the pandemic outbreak has brought while changing the church service pattern. The crisis is spreading and becoming the basis for the collapse of the traditional Church model. Traditional churches must be well prepared for the loss of believers and reduced economic devotion.
- Translated by Charlie Li
Disadvantages of Online Worship Services Emerge: Signs of Declining Attendance, Donations